Indonesia, Sri Lanka Condemn EU’s Gaza Stance

In a powerful stance against inconsistent international practices, the foreign ministers of Indonesia and Sri Lanka delivered a stinging rebuke to the European Union over what they deemed ‘double standards’ in addressing the conflict in Gaza compared to the crisis in Ukraine. The criticism came to the forefront as ministers from both Europe and the Indo-Pacific region convened in Brussels for a series of important ministerial meetings. Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi, alongside her Sri Lankan counterpart, Ali Sabry, highlighted this discrepancy in the treatment of international conflicts, calling for the EU to uphold the same values and principles of international law across all regions. Their collective assertions drew significant attention to the geopolitical dimensions of the EU’s foreign policy, stirring a debate over fairness and consistency that resonates far beyond the walls of diplomatic forums.

The sentiment expressed by the ministers reflects not just an isolated critique but taps into a broader discussion of global equity in international relations. The charge of double standards, woven into the fabric of ongoing diplomatic dialogues, accentuates a growing political controversy that challenges the EU to consider its role and actions on the world stage. As discussions progress, the focus on Gaza stands as a testament to the enduring and complex nature of global diplomacy, where every decision— or the lack thereof— leaves an indelible mark on the EU’s international credibility and moral compass.

Indonesia and Sri Lanka Voice their Concerns on EU’s Stance

Amid rising diplomatic tensions, the Foreign Ministers of Indonesia and Sri Lanka used a recent high-level international forum to articulate their concerns regarding inconsistencies in the European Union’s diplomatic practices, specifically focusing on the ongoing conflict in Gaza. This critical dialogue occurred as the EU engaged with leaders from across Southeast Asia and South Asia, bringing political criticism to the forefront of global discourse on international relations.

Call for a Consistent Approach Amidst International Forum

Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi, addressing delegates from Europe and the Indo-Pacific region, underscored the importance of ASEAN and the European Union leading by example with staunch adherence to international law. Articulating a firm hope that this principled stand should also apply to the dire situation in Gaza, Marsudi’s appeal pointed to a desire for the EU to adopt a uniform approach that accords with its stance on other international conflicts.

Global South’s Sentiment on Double Standards Presented

Representing the sentiments of the Global South, Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Ali Sabry raised compelling questions about the perceived discrepancy in the EU’s response to the plight of Palestinians in contrast with its actions toward Ukraine. His remarks advocated for equitable and impartial consideration for all human beings regardless of geographic or political divides, thereby addressing the broader international context and urging the EU to maintain a balanced perspective amidst ongoing conflicts.

EU’s Struggle with Forming a United Front on Gaza Conflict

In a striking remark on international relations, Josep Borrell, the European High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, has openly acknowledged the European Union’s challenge in presenting a united stance on the Gaza conflict. Borrowing from a global perspective, Borrell identified the ongoing political controversy that dominates international forums, where discussions concerning Gaza have become a recurring focal point of contention. This issue evidences the complexities inherent in a consortium like the EU, where diverse member states can both enrich and complicate the synthesis of harmonized political actions.

During the recent 3rd EU-Indo-Pacific Ministerial Forum and the 24th EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Borrell highlighted the EU’s divergent viewpoints regarding an appropriate reaction to the unfolding crisis in Gaza. With member states divided over the call for a ceasefire in the shadow of the Oct. 7 events, the EU’s capacity to form a coherent policy on the matter comes under intense scrutiny. The conflict underscores an unavoidable element of international diplomatic practice: the need to reconcile differing national policies and attitudes under the banner of collective response.

As the fissures within the EU’s position became apparent, Borrell emphasized his diplomatic role in aligning these variations to construct what he terms a “minimum common position”. Such a position maintains a commitment to humanitarian pauses in conflict and the pressing release of hostages. Borrell’s candid comments reveal an acute awareness that the global community may perceive EU actions—or inactions—in Gaza as a measure of its broader commitment to uphold international law and justice.

“My role is to try to put together different approaches, there is no double standard but there are different positions,” Borrell stated, alluding to the intricate dance of diplomacy that often unfolds behind closed doors. “The perception around the world is, in some cases, different from ours,” he continued, signaling the EU’s attentiveness to the broader international community’s concerns and their impact on the credibility of Western institutions.

Looking forward, Borrell expressed his intention to raise the matter again, suggesting a willingness within the EU to engage in a deeper reflection on its role in international affairs. This introspection is particularly pertinent as the EU seeks to bolster its relations and influence within the fast-growing Indo-Pacific region—a move which requires not just strategic alliances but also the moral authority that comes from consistent and principled global engagement.

Indonesia and Sri Lanka Blast EU for ‘Double Standards’ on Gaza

In a forthright critique of the European Union, Indonesia and Sri Lanka have censured the EU for displaying ‘double standards’ in its approach to the Gaza conflict, highlighting a fissure in global diplomatic unity. During significant ministerial forums involving ASEAN and the EU, the two nations have called for more consistent adherence to international law and humanitarian principles.

ASEAN’s Immediate Cease-Fire Appeals Versus EU’s Minimum Position

The discrepancy between ASEAN’s and the EU’s stance on the Gaza crisis was brought into sharp focus as ASEAN leaders joined Indonesia and Sri Lanka in urging for an immediate cease-fire. This juxtapositions the EU’s more conservative ‘minimum common position’, which stops short of definitive action, signaling a divided perspective within the bloc. The member countries of ASEAN, demonstrating solidarity, have stressed the utmost urgency for halting the hostilities and ensuring humanitarian access and the release of hostages.

Echoes from the Indo-Pacific Forum: A Global Call for Equality

The echoes of the EU-ASEAN meetings carry far beyond their closing sessions, serving as a clarion call for global equality and uniform application of international law. The joint statement, reflecting a shared condemnation of any attacks on civilians, conveys a strong consensus on upholding human rights and the integrity of humanitarian interventions in Gaza. It also sheds light on the significance of the interim rulings by the International Court of Justice, which instruct on the necessary steps to prevent harm to Gaza’s civilian population.

The candid discussions in these international forums, led by voices from Indonesia and Sri Lanka, have articulated not just a regional concern but a global imperative. These dialogues underscore the principle that actions—or the lack thereof—can significantly shape the world’s perception of an entity’s dedication to justice and fairness, a sentiment that lies at the heart of these nations’ impassioned blast against the EU.

Analysis of the EU’s International Role and Indo-Pacific Engagement

The European Union, with its storied history on the global stage and evolving international role, faces a pivotal moment in shaping its future relationship with the Indo-Pacific region. In an era where global security issues and development take center stage, the EU’s engagement strategy is keenly watched by international observers. The increasing imperative to collaborate on initiatives that address international rule of law, environmental sustainability, and security is indicative of the EU’s commitment to a comprehensive partnership with the Indo-Pacific economies, a region experiencing rapid economic growth and transformation.

Despite intentions to foster deep relationships within this dynamic landscape, the EU’s efforts have recently come under scrutiny. Dharmendra Kanani of the think tank Friends of Europe has pointed out that, while objectives such as enhancing maritime coordination and port safety in South and Southeast Asia propose a forward-moving agenda, there remains a stark gap between agreed frameworks and the implementation of practical measures. These concerns underscore the complex reality the EU faces—balancing ambitious policy directives with the pragmatic geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific. It emphasizes the importance of actualizing a cohesive plan that translates into tangible benefits for both the EU and its partners.

Additionally, the disparity between the strategic postures of the European Union and its transatlantic ally, the United States, poses further questions about the efficacy and alignment of their respective Indo-Pacific strategies. The toll such dissonance could take on addressing the spectrum of global security issues cannot be understated. Inclusion of key regional players, particularly India, is a cornerstone for assembling a broader, interlinked approach that could significantly magnify the EU’s impact on regional development, environmental stewardship, and the promotion of international rule of law.

About The Author

Shanika Jayasekara

I am a professional content writer with over 4 years’ experience in writing for clients from across countries and industries – from health, fashion, food to home decor, and more. An MBA in Brand Management from University Colombo, I draw upon my professional experience to create content that is tailor-made for your target audience.

See author's posts